[bleed style=”aigac”]
There are endless and frequent discussions on forums and message boards questioning the value of admissions consulting.
[/bleed]
By Linda Abraham, Accepted.com founder and president.
One of the more common arguments against using a consultant runs something like this:
“Everyone I know that’s been accepted and is attending top schools did so without … an admissions consultant … Is [using a consultant] crucial to top-school acceptance? Absolutely not.
I’m sure if you took a poll of AIGAC members, the overwhelming majority would have attended grad school without the aid of a consultant. Many, including me, would not have taken a test prep course before applying to graduate school.
However, over the last thirty years, test preparation went from being an act of desperation to a competitive edge, to a mainstay of the application process. Today, to maximize the chances of a top score and acceptance at the best possible school, virtually all applicants take a test prep course.
The same phenomenon is occurring in admissions consulting, but educational advising is currently at the “competitive edge” stage. At this point, using a consultant is not crucial for some. It is extremely helpful for all.
The question is not whether one can get accepted to business, law, or medical school without a consultant. Many are accepted without professional advising. The question is: Are the advantages of using a consultant worth the cost?
First, let’s discuss the ways in which a consultant can help you. We bring:
How do these benefits justify the cost and provide a critical competitive edge?
Using an admissions consultant can:
So can you gain acceptance to a graduate school without using an admissions consultant? Certainly. Should you try? Only if you don’t value the experience, objectivity, and skill that can provide you with returns many times the cost.